Part Two this is the way the State of Kansas removes children !

THIS IS ALL ONE DAY'S EVENTS HOW MANY LAWS CAN THE STATE VIOLATE ?
This is how Clear The State of Kansas corruption really is. Judge Henderson, Nola Foulston, Ron Pascal, Lynnette Herrmann, the Wichita Police Dept. Department of SRS/CPS.

I will include State Statutes, Federal Laws that apply.

THIS ALL HAPPENED IN ONE DAY
AUGUST 26TH 2008,

Paul L. Baker is Ashton's biological NON-CUSTODIAL father. Who is currently owes over $10,000.00 in Back Child support.

Paul and Ashton got into a disagreement and Ashton came home.
Paul thinking he would be relieved of his financial support obligation if Ashton was in states custody made a false "Runaway report"

Lawful Custodial Parent ME Bambi Hazen called ALL the proper entities including Wichita Police Dept., Exploited and Missing Children's unit , SRS to cancel the runaway report.



PARAGRAPH T: "Mother contacted SRS to inform the Agency that she was home, the child was NOT on the run and that she wanted to cancel the runaway report. Mother insisted the child was not on the run"

State Law required Officer Virgil Pinager with the Wichita Police Dept. to cancel the runaway report.

K.S.A 75-712c: Same; reports of missing persons; duties of law enforcement agencies. (b) The reporting party shall be advised to immediately notify the law enforcement agency in the event the missing person returns or is located. Upon location of or contact by the missing person, the law enforcement agency shall clear the case in the national crime information center and Kansas bureau of investigation databases.

PARAGRAPH T: "Ms. Kenney (SRS Case worker) contacted Patrol East and requested that the runaway report NOT BE CANCELLED"

Ms. Kenney from SRS/CPS and the Wichita Police Department CLEARLY conspired against my rights and my childs rights in their official capacity and as individuals.

FEDERAL LAW SAYS
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

PARAGRAPH T: "Ms Kenney made the recommendation that when the child is found that she be placed at the Wichita Childrens Home until the court hearing on Sept. 2nd 2008."

State law says:
K.S.A 38-2232: Child under 18 taken into custody; duties of officers; placed in shelter facility or with other person; application of law enforcement officer; release of child. If, after delivery of the child to a shelter facility, the person in charge of the shelter facility at that time and the law enforcement officer determine that the child will not remain in the shelter facility and if the child is presently alleged, but not yet adjudicated, to be a child in need of care solely pursuant to subsection (d)(9) or (d)(10) of K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 38-2202, and amendments thereto, the law enforcement officer shall deliver the child to a juvenile detention facility or other secure facility, designated by the court, where the child shall be detained for not more than 24 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.

LETS CALCULATE THE STATES VERSION OF 24 HOURS AS ALLOWED PER KANSAS LAW
Tuesday Aug 26th 08
1. Wed. Aug.27th, 08 (24 HOURS) TIMES UP PER LAW AT THIS POINT
2. Thurs. Aug. 28th, 08 (48 HOURS)
3. Fri. Aug. 29th 08 (72 HOURS)
4. Sat. Aug. 30th, 08 (DOESNT APPLY WEEKEND)
5. Sun. Aug. 31th,08 (DOESNT APPLY WEEKEND)
6. Mon. Sept. 1st, 08 (holiday DOESNT APPLY)
7. Tues. Sept. 2nd, 08 COURT DATE

FEDERAL LAW SAY'S
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


The Dept Of SRS through Ms. Kenney and her personal ,recommendation is contrary to State law, So in her official capacity under the color of law Social Workers are appearantly allowed to make their own laws and the other entities followed. That unlawful recommendation has resulted in and needlessly traumatized ALL 4 of my children, and in fact my WHOLE ENTIRE FAMILY.

SAME DAY AUGUST 26TH 2008 AFTER I CANCELLED THE FALSE RUNAWAY REPORT AND AFTER THE STATES RECOMMENDATION TO THE WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT

3 Uniformed Wichita Police Officers 1 in Plain clothes Officer Nagy with Exploited and Missing Children's unit arrive at my residence.

No Warrant, No Court order, No Probable cause.
Unlawfully enter and Search my home

Kansas State Statute
K.S.A 77-702: Public policy; purpose of act. On and after January 1, 1996, it is the public policy of the state of Kansas that state agencies, in planning and carrying out governmental actions, anticipate, be sensitive to and account for the obligations imposed by the fifth and the 14th amendments of the constitution of the United States and section 18 of the bill of rights of the constitution of the state of Kansas. It is the express purpose of this act to reduce the risk of undue or inadvertent burdens on private property rights resulting from certain lawful governmental actions.

KANSAS CONSTITUTION

Bill of Rights

§ 15. Search and seizure. The right of the people to be secure in their persons and property against unreasonable searches and seizures shall be inviolate; and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or property to be seized.

U.S. Constitution: Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

What makes these official's acting under the "Color of Law" to perceive the laws of the land do not apply to them ? Can anyone answer me that ?

WAIT TIL YOU SEE PART 3 YOU THOUGHT THIS WAS BAD SOOO MUCH MORE.

THE SAD PART ABOUT IT IS THIS DAY AUG. 26TH 2008 IS NOT OVER SEE PART 3.