About Me

My photo
Wichita, Kansas, United States
My 13 year old Daughter was arrested in OUR HOME as a runaway SHE WAS NEVER A RUNAWAY VIEW THE ARREST REPORT LOCATED ON THIS BLOG SHE WAS ARRESTED AT HER HOME ADDRESS HOW CAN A CHILD WHO IS AT HOME BE A RUNAWAY THE STATUTE THAT IS LISTED ON THE ARREST REPORT WAS REPEALED 2 YEARS PRIOR TO HER ARREST AND THEREFORE SHE WAS ARRESTED ON AN INVALID STATUTE NO WARRANT NO COURT ORDER NO PROBABLE CAUSE LAWFULLY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ENTER MY HOME YET THEY FORCED THEIR WAY IN AND ILLEGALLY SEIZED MY CHILD PROOF IN THE COURT DOCUMENTS PROVIDED HERE ON THIS BLOG. The state has held her in their custody ever since Aug.26th 08 the day of her arrest, and have not substantiated any claim of any type of any kind of abuse yet they wont allow her to come home.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Journal entry PROOF OF COURT INCOMPETENCE


Paragraph 14 on this journal entry page states I never filed a motion to have my daughter placed back in my home, The Judge did not even as much as flip through the case file to verify his "Findings" As this was the very same Judge who denied that motion 5 months proir to this hearing. See my previous post and the motion I filed and the courts journal entry filed as a result in that hearing. What is going on and how are courts, Judges, the system as a whole allowed to get away with these blantent fraudulent lies.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

My email Address

Feel Free to email me with any questions or comments at b_haz@yahoo.com

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

SRS POLICY ON "CINC" INVESTIGATIONS ARE THEY DOING THEIR JOB ? Click here for the entire Manual

Sample of what you'll find:

Sec. 2474 While the ultimate decision to remove a child in SRS custody rests with SRS (subject to court review), the contract agency responsible for placement and services to the child shall have the lead responsibility in the removal decision (with consultation from SRS). Removal of a child is to be based on the best interests of the child.

Remember: It is not an emergency when a long standing circumstance becomes known to the agency or contractor. For example, the contract agency learns a foster parent is consuming alcohol on a regular basis and has been for several months. If there is no report of harm to the child in placement, this information would not warrant emergency removal of the child.

MY CHILD WAS REMOVED FOR ALLEGED "TRUANCY" YET FOSTER PARENTS CAN GET AWAY WITH THAT ??