About Me

My photo
Wichita, Kansas, United States
My 13 year old Daughter was arrested in OUR HOME as a runaway SHE WAS NEVER A RUNAWAY VIEW THE ARREST REPORT LOCATED ON THIS BLOG SHE WAS ARRESTED AT HER HOME ADDRESS HOW CAN A CHILD WHO IS AT HOME BE A RUNAWAY THE STATUTE THAT IS LISTED ON THE ARREST REPORT WAS REPEALED 2 YEARS PRIOR TO HER ARREST AND THEREFORE SHE WAS ARRESTED ON AN INVALID STATUTE NO WARRANT NO COURT ORDER NO PROBABLE CAUSE LAWFULLY ALLOWING OFFICERS TO ENTER MY HOME YET THEY FORCED THEIR WAY IN AND ILLEGALLY SEIZED MY CHILD PROOF IN THE COURT DOCUMENTS PROVIDED HERE ON THIS BLOG. The state has held her in their custody ever since Aug.26th 08 the day of her arrest, and have not substantiated any claim of any type of any kind of abuse yet they wont allow her to come home.

Thursday, December 25, 2008



I am honestly exhausted of preaching to the choir only for everyone to turn a blind eye to whats going on in our American Juvenile/ Family court system . Tragic ,traumatic, terrifying tale that has forever needlessly, traumatized innocent lives and are victims of these monsters, I have 4 children and I just got out of jail for protecting my 13 y/o daughter the only 1 out of 4 that was "kidnapped" By Officer Nagy she was arrested in our own home on Aug. 26th 2008 without a warrant, without a court order, without even a crime commited by (in my opinion) A crooked Wichita Police officer Michal Nagy and a corrupt Sedgwick County District Attorneys office in Sedgwick County Kansas and Lying Social worker who committed purjury under oath. My daughter has been unlawfully held in states custody since. After her arrest that day the same arresting Officer Nagy delivered court documents of a hearing that was held on August 5th 2008 that was based on false allegations of truancy when she was proven on the record that she was properly, lawfully enrolled in a "non-accredited" private school registered and verified by and through the Kansas Department of Education to the reporting school 10 months prior to the state filing the false charges on July 14th 2008 WHEN SCHOOL IS NOT EVEN IN SESSION, I was never served a summons, never notified of that hearing on Aug 5th 2008 violating all state and federal rules of substantiave, procedural due process laws required in any and all court hearings, That hearing held placed my daughter in states custody!! I did not know of any of this til my daughter was arrested in my home Aug. 26th. I was never even given a 72 hour hearing required by law after her unlawful detainment, arrest. Judge Henderson signed an order stating she faced imminent danger if she was not immidiatly removed from my home AFTER she was arrested, what crime did she commited? (still a question not answered) if she was in so much danger any reasonable person would assume the other 3 children that reside in the same home would be too right ? Nope the social worker even deemed my home appropriate and the fact that I contacted the Associated Press in regards to the "kidnapping" of my daughter and exposed the corruption before they could even try to come for my other 3 children. The state has deprived me, my husband, my children of our substaintive, procedural, constitutionally protected fundemental rights. My daughter couldnt take the physical, mental, emotional abuse she recieved while unlawfully detained in the Wichita Childrens Home, Me, my husband, and 3 other children were allowed only 1 supervised visit per week, FOR FALSE TRUANCY CHARGES CAN YOU SAY CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT FOR OUR WHOLE FAMILY !!! I filed a motion for emergency placement back into our home along with professional medical documentation supporting the fact of Ashtons deterioration since her unlawful removal including documented weight loss of 23 lbs in 17 days, Fainting on at least 3 occasions, Throwing up after every meal unable to partcipate in PE due to excessive weakness reported by the PE teacher herself, and I provided all proper, lawful per state laws homeschool veriification and registration which was compelling evidence of innocence of the original false allegations of truancy that our Da's office filed. I did some research and learned that a hearing held without proper notification to the affected parties is void for lack of due process I sent out acknowledgements declaring my rights and it states in the acknowledgements that the temporary custody order in not voidable but simply void due to due process violations, and supreme court has clarified that on numorous occasions throughout time . Judge T. Henderson ignored all of it and denied my motion, letters, acknowledgments and made it worse for Ashton and our family by ordering that she had "no contact" other then our already court ordered 1 hour SUPERVISED visit per week FOR ALLEGED TRUANCY IN JULY ! Well Ashton couldnt take the abuse anymore so she ran from the childrens home, She is safe now thank god !! The state dont give a DAM about her best interest, dont even know their own best interest and wouldnt know the meaning if it slapped em in the face they just want their profit they recieve for children being in states custody. I was escorted out of the last court hearing December 12th 2008 in hand-cuffs and thrown in Sedgwick county jail with no bond for contempt of court when I refused to disclose my Daughters location to state officials invoking my parental rights to protect my child from abuse and officer Nagy the same arresting officer again charged me with a level 7 personal felony for "Aggrivated interferance of parental custody" and 2 counts of "Contributing to the mis-conduct of a minor child" bond for the first charge was $150,000 .On top of the contemp charge. My parental rights are not revoked, suspended, in any way shape or form and never has been, as a matter of fact she still has not yet even been adjudicated as a child in need of care yet, The law states that a hearing must be held within 30 days of the state filing a petition, IT WAS FILED ON JULY 16TH 2008 Hearing is scheduled for JAN 30TH 2009. WHAT IS GOING ON WHY IS THIS ALLOWED ? IS ANYONE PAYING ATTENTION HERE ? Here is the story to first published story by the Associated Press, following the first story I have provided a link to the USA Today article written when I was arrested and put in Jail.



Saturday, Oct 11, 2008
Posted on Tue, Oct. 07, 2008
Critics contend Kansas county too quick to take kidsBy ROXANA HEGEMANAssociated Press Writer
WICHITA, Kan. _ When a local middle school mistakenly reported a 13-year-old home-schooler to the state as a truant, it seems like the matter could have been easily cleared up.
Instead, Ashton Baker ended up in the Wichita Children's Home, having been dragged into the state child-welfare system in a county that critics contend is one of the most likely places in the U.S. to take children from their parents.
Along the way, Ashton's mother, Bambi Baker-Hazen, missed a court hearing, which she says she never received notice of, and her ex-husband was given temporary custody of their daughter. After Ashton ran back to her mother's house, police arrested the girl as a runaway. A judge subsequently found a lack of supervision at the mother's house and ordered Ashton placed in the Wichita Children's Home, although Baker-Hazen still has custody of her three other children — ages 6, 8 and 16. The girl ran away from the home on Monday and was still missing Tuesday, according to her mother.
Baker-Hazen contends that the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services misled the court when it said it made reasonable efforts to keep her family together. The department and the local district attorney's office won't discuss the case, citing privacy laws, but Baker-Hazen produced documents confirming that truancy was the reason for the department's involvement.
Her allegations aren't unusual in Sedgwick County. While the state agency says it complies with all federal rules, the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform claims that the department is evading requirements that reasonable efforts be made to keep children out of foster care and that it is underreporting cases to a central federal database. Critics contend officials in Sedgwick County are overreacting to some high-profile child abuse cases, such as a 2006 one involving two Wichita children allegedly starved, beaten and tortured by their father and stepmother.
Advocacy groups and angry parents have pointed to comments from the head of the state agency, Don Jordan, who indicated in March that his case workers felt pressured by the Sedgwick County district attorney's office to include false information in court documents to ensure children are removed from homes. Jordan has since retracted that statement and the district attorney's office denies the allegation, but a complaint from local family advocacy group Citizens for Change Inc. led to an audit of the state agency by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Results haven't been released, but the federal agency has noted that the Kansas department will be implementing an improvement plan soon.
According to National Coalition for Child Protection Reform's analysis of official numbers, 6.3 per every 1,000 children in Sedgwick County were removed in 2007, up from 4.2 per 1,000 children in 2006, when the national removal rate was 4.1 per 1,000 children. National statistics aren't yet available for 2007, but the group's executive director, Richard Wexler, expects the removal rate for the country to remain largely unchanged.
While some other counties across the U.S. had much higher rates in 2006 (for example, Philadelphia County, Pa.'s rate was 10.2 and Franklin County, Ohio's was 10.6), Wexler's Alexandria, Va.-based group contends that 80 percent of children removed in Sedgwick County may not show up in official numbers.
"If you counted all of the off-the-books placements, Sedgwick County would be a candidate for the child removal capital of America," Wexler said.
He said Kansas, unlike other states, uses a loophole in federal law and does not count in its foster care placement numbers those children taken into "police protective custody" who are returned days later.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services, Michelle Ponce, said the agency reports all cases that involve the department, as required by federal regulations. She said she has not seen any good data involving the numbers of children taken into police protective custody, when the department is not always involved.
According to its Web site, the Wichita Children's Home took in 1,861 children from police referrals in 2006, compared with 631 children from the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services and 69 from parents.
Ashton ended up at the children's home after a middle school that mistakenly had her on its rolls reported her as truant, even though her mother's home was properly registered as a home school. Baker-Hazen has since enrolled her other three children in public schools.
Although the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services stated in court documents that it made numerous attempts to find the mother before a hearing on the truancy matter that led to the father gaining temporary custody, Baker-Hazen said the only thing the agency did was deliver a summons to her vacant former address. The girl's father, Paul Baker, called police and reported the girl as a runaway when he found her missing from his home. Police found the girl at her mother's house and took her away in handcuffs, something police say is common in cases involving runaways.
Both parents are now trying to get Ashton back, but Baker-Hazen said that because the girl ran away from the children's home she would end up in a juvenile detention facility once she's found. The mother said she had not heard from her missing daughter.
"I think she is scared. I know she is scared," Baker-Hazen said Tuesday.
And although Baker had concerns about the education his daughter was receiving at her mother's house, he said he agreed with his ex-wife about one thing: "She should be with one of her parents."


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/states/kansas/2008-12-12-1120627356_x.htm#uslPageReturn